• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About BAHP®
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Pressroom
  • References
  • English
  • Español (Spanish)

Diaper Answers

Center for Baby & Adult Hygiene Products

Search

  • Home
  • Diaper Safety & Health
    • Diaper Safety & Health
    • Safety
    • Chemical Traces Do Not Pose a Risk to the Safety of Baby Diapers
    • Skin Health
    • Clinical Studies & Consumer Data
    • Diapers Cannot Cause Chemical Burns
  • How Diapers Are Made
    • How Diapers Are Made
    • Colors in Diapers
    • Parts of a Diaper
    • Innovative Materials & Design
  • FAQs
    • Diaper Safety and Health
    • How Diapers Are Made
    • Diapers and the Environment
  • Diapers & the Environment
    • Diapers & the Environment
    • Environmental Stewardship
    • Diapers and Solid Waste
    • Protecting the Environment
    • Life Cycle Assessments
    • Cloth vs. Disposables
  • Blog

Using Life Cycle Assessments to Understand Cloth vs. Disposables

cloth-vs-disposable

All diapers, cloth or disposable, impact the environment. However, life cycle assessments conducted in the U.S., Germany, Scandinavia, the Netherlands, Canada, and the U.K. since the 1980s all reach the same conclusion: cloth diapers consume more water and produce more waterborne emissions due to laundering, while disposables produce more solid waste and consume more natural resources.

It is important to examine all aspects of a product’s life cycle, rather than just selecting one, such as solid waste, as the basis for choosing a product. Otherwise consumers could ignore categories such as energy usage or air and water pollution, which may have a greater impact. Favoring only one part of the life cycle does not offer an overall environmental benefit.

The specific numerical results in recent LCAs differ due to differences in geography, methodology and assumptions (most studies predate international standards), and local energy and waste infrastructure. Despite these differences, these LCAs support the conclusion that all diapering systems have an environmental impact. They all consume raw materials, energy, and water. They all generate some wastes to water, air, and land.

A 2005 analysis published by U.K. Environment Agency (Life Cycle Assessment of Disposable and Reusable Nappies in the U.K.) investigated the impact of three diapering systems: cloth diapers with home wash, cloth diapers with commercial laundry, and disposable diapers.

The study found that:

  • There is no significant difference between any of the environmental impacts of the disposable, home-use reusable and commercial laundry systems.
  • No system had superior environmental performance, although the life cycle stages that are the main source for these impacts are different for each system.
  • All three systems do not contribute substantially to overall solid waste totals.
  • the global warming and non-renewable resource depletion impact over one child’s diaper-wearing period (estimated at 2.5 years) is comparable to driving a car between 1,300 and 2,200 miles.

Primary Sidebar

  • Diapers & the Environment
  • Environmental Stewardship
  • Diapers and Solid Waste
  • Life Cycle Assessments
  • Protecting the Environment
  • Cloth vs. Disposables

Meet Dr. Lorraine Beraho, BAHP’s Expert Advisor for Baby Care

Disposable Diapers Cause Less Diaper Rash

Today's diapers help maintain healthy skin by quickly capturing urine and locking it away deep inside the diaper.
Read More

Footer

LinkedInTwitter

  • Diaper Safety & Health
  • How Diapers Are Made
  • FAQs
  • Diapers & the Environment
  • About BAHP®
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Pressroom
  • References
  • English
  • Español (Spanish)

© Center for Baby & Adult Hygiene Products 2017.